Planul Baxendale
Toby Baxendale, preşedinte al Cobden Centre, ne atrage iarăşi atenţia că suveranul e înţolit din cap până-n picioare în aer subţire fabricat de croitoraşii bancheri. Şi redă esenţa planului de reformă financiară propus de Huerta de Soto, adaptată la situaţia actuală a finanţelor engleze.
The Emperor’s New Clothes: How to Pay off the National Debt & Give a 28.5% Tax Cut
1. Print cash and replace all the demand-deposits/IOUs that exist in the system with that cash. This means the government printing approx £850 billion in cash and injecting it directly into the vaults of the banks and into the accounts of individuals. Thus, if you deposited £100 once thinking it was “yours,” it now really exists in cash, with the bank acting as custodian of your money.
2. Mandate all banks to hold your cash (100% reserved) on demand at all times.
3. Wipe from the bank ledgers all the demand-deposits/IOUs as banks would not owe you money anymore. This means the “thin air” money disappears, to be replaced exactly with cash money. Note: this is not inflationary, as the cash replaces the demand-deposit which acted as money. As we have established, it is only thin-air that the banking system has created to facilitate the multiplicity of lending of the same bit of money, so its total replacement with cash would mean the money supply stays exactly the same.
4. Require all banks to lend real savings that people knowingly place with banks to lend to businesses to get a return of interest and capital back when the business repays that loan. This is nice, simple and safe utility banking. This is what Mervyn King advocates.
5. As you are not a creditor of the bank anymore, the banking system will only have its assets and its capital, i.e. no liabilities. This means that there never again could be a bank run.
6. As for the banks, not having you the depositor as a liability anymore, they will suddenly be £850 billion better off, with no current liabilities and only assets (loans to business etc), post reform. The government can now put those assets into Mutuals, which would then immediately pay off the national debt, and leave the banks in exactly the same position net worth wise as they were prior to the reform, owned by their existing shareholders. As the national debt is still just under the £850 billion, which would be available as surplus assets of the banks, this could still be achieved.
7. No national debt means no interest costs (currently £40 billion p.a) associated with paying for our borrowing. Therefore, give an immediate 28.5% income-tax cut. Total income-tax raised is £142 billion.
“2. Mandate all banks to hold your cash (100% reserved) on demand at all times”
Dar aceasta nu este o forma de reglementare? Chiar daca s-ar incerca aplicarea la sange – bancheri spanzurati la Tyburn pentru ca au lucrat cu rezerve fractionale – tot s-ar gasi suficienti care sa ocoleasca restrictia.
coroborat cu:
“1. Print cash and replace all the demand-deposits/IOUs that exist in the system with that cash.”
ar aduce rapid UK in situatia fostei colonii africane Rhodesia :)
“3. Wipe from the bank ledgers all the demand-deposits/IOUs as banks would not owe you money anymore.”
Consecinta directa a (1) si (2), dar dupa cum am spus, aceste conditii sunt foarte greu (daca nu imposibil) de indeplinit practic.
“4. Require all banks to lend real savings that people knowingly place with banks to lend to businesses to get a return of interest and capital back when the business repays that loan.”
De bun simt, depozitele “la vedere” ar trebui clar separate de investitii. Dar cine i-ar forta in mod eficace pe bancheri sa faca acesta separare intr-un mod strict? Oare clientii ar accepta sa-si tina banii intr-un depozit unde nu numai ca nu primesc dobanda, dar mai si platesc un comision de administrare, in conditiile in care publicul a fost obisnuit zeci de ani cu asteptari inflationiste?
“7. No national debt means no interest costs” evident, dar daca politicienii vor fi tentati din nou sa intre in datorii si sa reia miscarile descrise anterior de nenumarate ori?
Per ansamblu, planul este unul utopic, chiar daca, prin absurd, ar functiona in niste conditii date, succesul sau nu ar face decat sa legitimeze monopolul monetar al statului si moneda fiat ca mijloc de schimb.
Alex Nicolin · 22 iunie 2010, 01:52 · #
O parte din obiecţiile tale şi altele îşi găsesc răspunsul în capitolul 9 al tratatului lui Huerta de Soto.
Tudor · 22 iunie 2010, 13:31 · #